Control: reassign -1 libvirt0 1.0.2-1 Control: severity -1 wishlist 21.05.2013 22:13, Michael Tokarev wrote: > 21.05.2013 22:06, Vincent Legout wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Michael Tokarev <m...@tls.msk.ru> writes: >> >>> 21.05.2013 21:15, Vincent Legout wrote: >>>> apt-get dist-upgrade failed because qemu-system-x86 declares a Breaks on >>>> libvirt0 (<< 1.0) but libvirt 1.0 is only available in experimental. >>> >>> Oh. I haven't noticed that not all necessary bits are available in unstable. >>> >>> So, what do you think we should do? Remove qemu from unstable? >> >> I don't know. I'd say there are two options. Wait for libvirt 1.0 to be >> uploaded to unstable while keeping unstable broken with qemu 1.5.0. Or >> get back to the previous version of qemu and wait for libvirt 1.0 before >> uploading qemu 1.5.0 to unstable. > > Thank you for the opinion. > >> I'd choose the second option, but others may have a different opinion... > > Unfortunately this is kind of impossible, because due to changes > in the toolchain previous version of qemu (1.1x) does not build > anymore. Unrelated to this, but we can't build even bios anymore. > > There's a 3rd option ofcourse: remove the Breaks, and just pretend > everything's ok. And add it back once libvirt moves on. > > But honestly that's all wrong. I don't know what to do either, that's > exactly why I asked you. Maybe it's just one of the examples of unstable > being just that -- "unstable" -- at times, something we just have to live > with. Oh well.
Ok, I know what to do about this. I just turned this into a whishlist against libvirt. Thank you for your bugreport. /mjt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
