On Sat, 2013-05-18 at 17:49 +0800, Geoff Levand wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-05-17 at 20:54 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > kexec-tools is not available on all archs.  If petitboot needs it, it
> > needs to be restricted to those architectures with a kexec-tools
> > package.
> > 
> >     petitboot/mips unsatisfiable Depends: kexec-tools
> >     petitboot/mipsel unsatisfiable Depends: kexec-tools
> >     petitboot/s390x unsatisfiable Depends: kexec-tools
> >     petitboot/sparc unsatisfiable Depends: kexec-tools
> 
> It was decided by others before you that what you suggest is
> not correct.

That doesn't mean they were right. Was this decision made somewhere
public?

> With the way we have it now when kexec-tools
> works for those arches, petitboot will work for those arches
> automatically.

And in the meantime it's RC buggy on those architectures, meaning the
new version will not migrate to testing.

What you're describing sounds like a suggestion to build-depend on
kexec-tools - in fact, the package in stable and testing does exactly
that; the build dependency appears to have been dropped in petitboot's
12.10.16.14.58-ge7815dc-1 upload with no mention in the changelog.

> If you want to do something I recommend you file a bug against
> kexec-tools to have it fixed for those listed arches.  

Such a bug wouldn't be RC in any case, and doesn't change the fact that
petitboot has been uninstallable on several architectures for nearly six
months.

Regards,

Adam


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to