Your message dated Thu, 16 May 2013 14:29:40 +0200
with message-id <201305161429.50776.hol...@layer-acht.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#708523: flashplugin-nonfree: package belongs to 
non-free instead of contrib
has caused the Debian Bug report #708523,
regarding flashplugin-nonfree: package belongs to non-free instead of contrib
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
708523: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=708523
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: flashplugin-nonfree
Version: 1:3.2
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.2

Dear Maintainer,

As far as I can tell the sole purpose of this package is to download and 
install the (non-free) flash plugin on the system. Because of this I 
consider the package actually belongs in non-free.

Thank you for your work on maintaining this package.

Kind regards,
Andrei


-- Package-specific info:
Debian version: jessie/sid
Architecture: i386
Package version: 1:3.2
Adobe Flash Player version: LNX 11,2,202,258
MD5 checksums:
        abcc42d405b0bcce8074bb7b34c4904c  
/var/cache/flashplugin-nonfree/get-upstream-version.pl
        f057d0dc4b6239c447410dc99797e270  
/var/cache/flashplugin-nonfree/install_flash_player_10_linux.tar.gz
        ed48f0db80969b1df1e9aab9a9276b8a  
/var/cache/flashplugin-nonfree/install_flash_player_11_linux.i386.tar.gz
        ca66d6da242caa45f2c9175c1367c984  
/usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so
Alternatives:
        flash-mozilla.so - auto mode
          link currently points to 
/usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so
        /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so - priority 50
        Current 'best' version is 
'/usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so'.
        lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 34 Dec 18 11:26 
/usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/flash-mozilla.so -> /etc/alternatives/flash-mozilla.so
        /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/flash-mozilla.so: symbolic link to 
`/etc/alternatives/flash-mozilla.so' 

-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (500, 
'oldstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.8-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=ro_RO.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=ro_RO.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages flashplugin-nonfree depends on:
ii  binutils               2.22-8
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]  1.5.50
ii  gnupg                  1.4.12-7
ii  libatk1.0-0            2.8.0-2
ii  libcairo2              1.12.14-4
ii  libcurl3-gnutls        7.30.0-2
ii  libfontconfig1         2.9.0-7.1
ii  libfreetype6           2.4.9-1.1
ii  libgcc1                1:4.8.0-7
ii  libglib2.0-0           2.36.1-2build1
ii  libgtk2.0-0            2.24.17-2
ii  libnspr4               2:4.9.6-1
ii  libnss3                2:3.14.3-1
ii  libpango1.0-0          1.30.0-1
ii  libstdc++6             4.8.0-7
ii  libx11-6               2:1.5.0-1
ii  libxext6               2:1.3.1-2
ii  libxt6                 1:1.1.3-1
ii  wget                   1.14-1

flashplugin-nonfree recommends no packages.

Versions of packages flashplugin-nonfree suggests:
pn  flashplugin-nonfree-extrasound  <none>
pn  hal                             <none>
ii  iceweasel                       17.0.6esr-1
pn  konqueror-nsplugins             <none>
ii  ttf-dejavu                      2.33+svn2514-3
pn  ttf-mscorefonts-installer       <none>
pn  ttf-xfree86-nonfree             <none>

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi Andrei,

On Donnerstag, 16. Mai 2013, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> Justification: Policy 2.2.2

thats exactly why I'm closing this bug, quoting from there:

Examples of packages which would be included in contrib are: 

 wrapper packages or other sorts of free accessories for non-free programs.
 

whether you call it a wrapper or a free accessory for flashplugin is up to 
you, but it certainly 100% meets even the example definition of contrib.


cheers,
        Holger

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to