Your message dated Wed, 15 May 2013 11:03:38 +0200
with message-id
<ca+7wusxcaqn7risqh+7hrztyxtdren1t42hptnguge4ryzy...@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line activiz.net: ftbfs with GCC-4.8
has caused the Debian Bug report #701235,
regarding activiz.net: ftbfs with GCC-4.8
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
701235: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=701235
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: src:activiz.net
Version: 1:1.0~git20111123-6
Severity: important
Tags: sid jessie
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-gcc-4.8
The package fails to build in a test rebuild on at least amd64 with
gcc-4.8/g++-4.8, but succeeds to build with gcc-4.7/g++-4.7. The
severity of this report may be raised before the jessie release.
gccxml_cc1plus: error: gccxml_builtins.h: No such file or directory
The full build log can be found at:
/home/doko/www/logs-20130217/gcc48/aptitude_0.6.8.2-1_unstable_gcc48.log
http://people.debian.org/~doko/logs-20130217/gcc48/activiz.net_1.0~git20111123-6_unstable-gcc48.log
The last lines of the build log are at the end of this report.
To build with GCC 4.8, either set CC=gcc-4.8 CXX=g++-4.8 explicitly,
or install the gcc, g++, gfortran, ... packages from experimental.
apt-get -t experimental install g++-4.7 g++-4.8 libc6-dev
The test rebuild was done with eglibc-2.17 and GCC-4.8, so some issues
might be caused by the updated glibc.
[...]
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
reassign 701235 gccxml
found 701235 0.9.0+cvs20120420-4
fixed 701235 0.9.0+git20130511-1
thanks
I did a complete rebuild of activiz within a sid chroot. I cannot
reproduce it. I am guessing this was due to gccxml. Hence reassigning.
Thanks.
--- End Message ---
