Your message dated Sun, 12 May 2013 19:33:05 +0000
with message-id <e1ubc13-0000wi...@franck.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#707778: fixed in posh 0.12
has caused the Debian Bug report #707778,
regarding posh: set -e does not work (neither does set -x)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
707778: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=707778
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: posh
Version: 0.9.1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 10.4

posh  0.9.1 and following versions (I've checked 0.10, 0.10.2, 0.11.1)
is no longer a policy compilant shell.

[11]/tmp> cat test.sh
set -e
set -x
false
echo "Last command status: $?"
[12]/tmp> posh test.sh; echo $?
Last command status: 1
0

For comparison, expected output from last working version of posh (0.9)
[17]/tmp> dpkg -l posh | grep posh
ii  posh                                           0.9
i386         Policy-compliant Ordinary SHell
[18]/tmp> posh test.sh; echo $?
+ false
1


Regards,
robert

-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (200, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 3.5-trunk-686-pae (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=pl_PL, LC_CTYPE=pl_PL (charmap=ISO-8859-2)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages posh depends on:
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]  1.5.50
ii  libc6                  2.17-1

posh recommends no packages.

posh suggests no packages.

-- debconf information excluded

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: posh
Source-Version: 0.12

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
posh, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 707...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Clint Adams <cl...@debian.org> (supplier of updated posh package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 12 May 2013 13:26:01 -0500
Source: posh
Binary: posh
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.12
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Clint Adams <cl...@debian.org>
Changed-By: Clint Adams <cl...@debian.org>
Description: 
 posh       - Policy-compliant Ordinary SHell
Closes: 707778
Changes: 
 posh (0.12) unstable; urgency=high
 .
   * Fix shell flag handling, broken since 0.9.1.  closes: #707778.
Checksums-Sha1: 
 6013c6cade858f9487b570bf56bc83a65e3b7b24 1514 posh_0.12.dsc
 1d9e1ccbf0782b20726dca7f8d1c87de6a49d0bd 469680 posh_0.12.tar.gz
 216aaf68a5a66d0e06d6f9348e43e59c7ce7cf38 95030 posh_0.12_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 6f6da0b2cbb64e3f11acb54f675c2eb7216fe9c6fd11f84ef8714bcb52f6a0a3 1514 
posh_0.12.dsc
 9206b67005cf357404b3f3021c2d7c7bbd50756050512dececb9ed836435b048 469680 
posh_0.12.tar.gz
 ece9d918a3421ee5eb3002f1ed180176ee1c9e8347e635837e29101e39db455d 95030 
posh_0.12_amd64.deb
Files: 
 56f0e4f747e118aa5937a2db893e262b 1514 shells optional posh_0.12.dsc
 df45fea295ec8dcc462eaf797a682e47 469680 shells optional posh_0.12.tar.gz
 276f5d57bba33d46faf5445d814c890b 95030 shells optional posh_0.12_amd64.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Debian!

iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJRj+wSAAoJEFWSMx4ZnTioG+kP/0FwQnYOEdK4tkucxFdJE+xa
2aGPVzEPmYXokUnJNN5tpeZMyXE/Z7xVqQUKsmvsSe/0KBJOZa9W18qaGLXnt2jw
wFfOV1hfPxLLZpS34uK3lWzbHGXigIA07uvBfJRwZFUqeZ6lt8Uz1UzfY6qlInHo
haXZymyhuHbcKjLNlBiswLeLMAerebWqoulEc+jU8c/uoH6pSb14hPjxFehP8MgY
SrBS6saD9btdmg9B0IhG/XK+kn4HH4xUmTh0hCymcd5ZPjtpqmelJxBdDh8Vp7hY
IH3Ent0WUYIWpE3+3s23+7V4Ydd/H73P5K/zjWnftNmqKbewIgmURHUtDqpqNmiv
abOb/SrSj1CJM9mGVhks8zwT6yNYyrG7Jwx5ehIVoVcTFGrUT59QZ5IQc7oGiqyi
xnfUaVKM/CmDFbK1pX799jZLJna9mMqcBLkHmAo9yb6jmgxSbRTmFljrmPJaRlSO
SV33ki3InJiqaokf5uzezO2F1IBr5i7ZJk4hnPA6aklGqlcBlCHV0ehXw5ec+igO
p1OpdLbWjYWZ9mBlUmHOtF2fP/HTec4aGQrhapcKKz71chNR1ZOhxjKuQp1iHmrv
nIxgdyCIAMMexOo4FD7GZmXHpLo8Y+l3rdoQfGSKBwJmparbkFzie9AI4CgwrImD
LKd21seLtHYgTedeUQbI
=jCDm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to