Control: tag -1 + pending On Wed, 08 May 2013 13:10:12 +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
> > It's possible to have the "old" libjgoodies-forms-java installed > > (e.g. on a wheezy system) and then to install the "new" patched > > mediathekview, which will most probably break. > > > > So I think a versioned dependency on libjgoodies-forms-java >= 1.6 > > would indeed make sense for mediathekview. > > > Well, that's true. I didn't think thoroughly enough about the "mixed > distributions" case here because this is not a problem if you use pure > sid or pure testing whereby version 1.6.0-3 of libjgoodies-forms-java > enters before mediathekview. Ack. > Indeed a versioned dependency on > libjgoodies-forms-java makes sense in this case. Ok, I'm glad we reach the same conclusions :) > I'd be glad if you could lend me a helping hand with MV again. I have > prepared a new revision that contains only the versioned dependency change. > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mediathekview/mediathekview_3.2.1+git20130327-2.dsc Sure, I'll upload in a few hours when I'm back home. Cheers, gregor -- .''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe `- BOFH excuse #97: Small animal kamikaze attack on power supplies -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
