On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 10:48:46PM +0200, Michael Prokop wrote: > * Adam D. Barratt [Tue Apr 23, 2013 at 09:20:04PM +0100]: > > On Tue, 2013-04-23 at 22:17 +0200, Michael Prokop wrote: > > > * Adam D. Barratt [Tue Apr 23, 2013 at 09:03:26PM +0100]: > > > > What's the issue with the fix? If we need another upload for i-t for r0 > > > > then it'll need to be soon. :-| > > > > We've 0.109.1 which fixes that in wheezy and unstable, shouldn't > > > this be enough? Is experimental's 0.110 of i-t an issue WRT to r0? > > > I'd push a 0.111 release to experimental immediately then. > > > Bah, I misread the versions and thought it was affecting the recent > > upload to sid; sorry for the noise. > > No worries, I've just released and uploaded i-t v0.111 which > includes the fixes which went into wheezy (thanks for that, Ben) to > avoid further confusion.
Thanks! If you have time, could I talk you into uploading an updated backport for squeeze-backports, as well, to address this issue and 689830? - Josh Triplett -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
