Hi, On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 06:17:00PM +0200, David Kalnischkies wrote: > I have done very few tests, but it seems like bringing openoffice.org-core > back (as a transitional package) is the simplest workaround. If I remember > right all status-files I have seen so far about this issue (not that many, > but yeah) included openoffice (as I wondered why it was touched so early > and wanted to investigate this after wheezy), so while this sounds indeed > crazy I guess it would solve all known issues. Hence CC'ing the previous > maintainers to gaining some intelligence on how feasible this is. > > (Such a transition package needs to break at least > "openoffice.org-report-builder-bin" as it is otherwise not removed > on upgrade. I have no idea what else / how depends should look like)
I didn't provide openoffice.org-core as transitional package per intent as it's a package just needed by "real" stuff and that one now depends on libreoffice-core via their transitional packages (-writer, etc.) I don't like this - but if this is the only solution. Note it needs NEW. If the RT thinks thinks this should be done this late in the freeze I can do, though. Note it needs NEW. Regards, Rene -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
