+pkg-mozext This bug more correctly belongs to mozilla-devscripts as we use that package to generate dependencies. But I disagree that it's a bug at all. IIRC, your suggested behaviour was previously the default and we shifted away from it, because it means
- safe-upgrade won't be able to automatically upgrade your browser. - more importantly, the extension still works for icedove; we want the user to be able to install both the latest icedove and iceweasel, AND this extension should be installable (and it should be enabled for icedove and disabled for iceweasel) I intend to close this bug unless other arguments can be made to counter the above. X On 04/04/13 13:23, Michael Biebl wrote: > Package: xul-ext-gnome-keyring > Version: 0.6.8-1 > Severity: serious > > The latest update of iceweasel from 19.x to 20.0-1 broke the > xul-ext-gnome-keyring extension. iceweasel did mark the extension as > incompatible and disabled it. > > I guess, xul-ext-gnome-keyring needs to generate tighter dependencies so > an upgrade of iceweasel or icedove doesn't break it. > > Say, the extension was compiled against iceweasel v19, it should depend > on iceweasel >= 19 , iceweasel << 20 > > Michael > > > > > -- System Information: > Debian Release: 7.0 > APT prefers unstable > APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (200, 'experimental') > Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) > Foreign Architectures: i386 > > Kernel: Linux 3.8-trunk-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) > Locale: LANG=de_DE.utf8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) > Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash > > Versions of packages xul-ext-gnome-keyring depends on: > ii iceweasel 20.0-1 > ii libc6 2.13-38 > ii libgcc1 1:4.7.2-5 > ii libglib2.0-0 2.33.12+really2.32.4-5 > ii libgnome-keyring0 3.4.1-1 > ii libnspr4 2:4.9.5-1 > ii libnspr4-0d 2:4.9.5-1 > ii libstdc++6 4.7.2-5 > > xul-ext-gnome-keyring recommends no packages. > > xul-ext-gnome-keyring suggests no packages. > > -- no debconf information > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
