On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 06:35:22PM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Mar 2013 12:39:27 +0000, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> 
> > > Some thoughts:
> > > - I think fixing this on the packaging side is less invasive than
> > >   hacking the upstream autofoo stuff.
> > > - IMO, Evgeni's original patch in -3.3 matches what has been done for
> > >   quite a few other packages regarding to multiarch; obviously, the
> > >   build dependency on libmysqlclient-dev should be versioned.
> > > - An alternative would be to use mysql_config, as proposed by
> > >   Salvatore; patches against -3.2 and -3.3 attached.
> > > - Salvatore's patch (with "dpkg-architecture -qDEB_BUILD_MULTIARCH")
> > >   in configure.in) indeed looks not so elegant; OTOH that's the same as
> > >   in the already existing debian/patches/02_libav_multiarch.patch, so
> > >   it's at least consistent.
> > > 
> > > I guess someone needs to decide what we want to have in wheezy :)
> > 
> > It's been some weeks again since this; are we any closer to a resolution?
> 
> My guess is that everbody was waiting for an advice by the release
> team; so thanks for chiming in :)

:)
  
> > From glancing at the options Gregor's mysql_config patch looks reasonable,
> > though I have not tested it. It is certainly minimal.
> 
> Ok, thanks.
> 
> I just found a small issue with it: squeeze's mysql_config doesn't
> know about the "--variable=[pkglibdir]", so we technically need a
> versioned dependency on libmysqlclient-dev (probably >= 5.5, I don't
> find anything in the upstream or Debian changelog).
> 
> In this case we might as well go with Evgeni's original patch, and
> just add a ">= 5.5.17-4" to the libmysqlclient-dev build dependency.

Ok, either of those sounds sensible. Perhaps you could choose one and see
how it gets on with the auto-builders?

Evgeni's original patch got an ack from the reporter at least, so maybe
that's the one to go for.


Cheers,


-- 
Jonathan Wiltshire                                      j...@debian.org
Debian Developer                         http://people.debian.org/~jmw

4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC  74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51

<directhex> i have six years of solaris sysadmin experience, from
            8->10. i am well qualified to say it is made from bonghits
                        layered on top of bonghits

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to