On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 06:13:14PM +0100, Loic Minier wrote: > On Tue, Oct 11, 2005, Steve Langasek wrote: > > What is the status of this bug? You've tagged the bug "sarge" and referred > > to a post requesting sponsorship of an upload to proposed-updates, but this > > bug affects all of sarge, etch, and sid and the archive will not accept an > > upload of a package to proposed-updates newer than the version in > > testing/unstable. Do you have a fixed package available for unstable?
> Now gnome-cpufreq-applet is scheduled for removal (#338338) as this > applet was merged in gnome-applets. Do you think I should 1/ block its > removal, update the package in sid, wait that it migrates to testing, > and upload to stable, OR 2/ wait for its removal, upload to stable? > I think 1/ is braindead, as no-one benefits from the update, and no-one > will test the package. 2) is fine, IMHO. Cheers, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
