Jay Berkenbilt <q...@debian.org> wrote: > Stuart Prescott <stuart.presc...@bristol.ac.uk> wrote: > >> Package: nip2 >> Version: 7.28.4-1 >> Severity: serious >> Justification: DFSG3: must allow derived works >> >> Dear Maintainer, >> >> The file share/nip2/data/sRGB.icm is not licensed under the >> same terms as the rest of this package -- it is a file from HP and is not >> distributed under a free licence. >> >> . . . > > I have alerted upstream about this issue so they can track it. Since > there are ongoing discussions about possibly changing the license and > since this is being ignored for wheezy, other than alerting upstream, > I'm not planning on taking any immediate action.
Upstream has replaced these two files in https://github.com/jcupitt/nip2/commit/5a66f0e98b017bdd23c06f89f9b259c276a612a4 Should I try to prepare a new upload with the new profiles? It's going to be inconvenient because these are binary files, but if it would help, I can create a new upload for wheezy (via unstable) that has this fix. I just have to remind myself how to introduce a chance that can't be represented as a patch. (I use source format 3 (quilt) so it will be doable by copying the binary files to the debian directory and applying the change manually in rules.) Please let me know whether I should do this or whether it's sufficient that the problem will be fixed in the next upstream release that I package. -- Jay Berkenbilt <q...@debian.org> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
