tags 673038 + patch fixed-upstream thanks Hi All,
2013/1/28 Bálint Réczey <bal...@balintreczey.hu>: ... >> >> I think we're all in agreement that the code should be fixed. Please >> help to do that, if you can. > Upstream has rejected the proposed fix. > Since it seems I'm not familiar enough with upstream's plans and > coding practices I'm not the best person to provide a fix. Upstream (Howard Chu, thanks!) has committed and alternate fix [1] [2]. Please consider back-porting it to Debian instead of using my patch. Cheers, Balint [1]: http://www.openldap.org/lists/openldap-bugs/201302/msg00016.html [2]: http://www.openldap.org/devel/gitweb.cgi?p=openldap.git;a=blobdiff;f=servers/slapd/back-bdb/init.c;h=57690fc532a3c3c803ceeb1b404ad5952b5df734;hp=1d8527332a956d4c4122ae94a69f07ba9f4da9a1;hb=HEAD;hpb=1c99711ede25860b24750aab9c529a49c53756ae -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
