On 03.02.2013 22:37, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Sun, 2013-02-03 at 22:29 +0100, Markus Koschany wrote: >> On 03.02.2013 22:13, Adam D. Barratt wrote: >>> No. wheezy-ignore is a tag for the use of the Release Team and should >>> not be set without their agreement; see the bold sections in >>> http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#tags >>> >>> In this case it's also pointless. The BTS knows the bug only affects >>> unstable so there would be no need for us to ignore it in any case. >> >> Sorry for the confusion. I didn't know the BTS knows that the bug only >> affects unstable. Thanks for the clarification. > > Even if the BTS didn't know that, you shouldn't be setting the > wheezy-ignore tag without release team authorization; that was my main > point. > > I'll trust you'll remember this in future. :-)
Now i realize it's better to keep the feet still at a Sunday evening and not to attempt doing the release team's job. I completely missed the *bold* text and i'll definitely remember this incident. ;-) Regards, Markus
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
