On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 07:11:57PM +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote: >Hi, > >Am Sonntag, den 27.01.2013, 15:09 +0000 schrieb Steve McIntyre: >> Do we have any hope of progress on this RC bug? Otherwise it's >> incredibly tempting to push for removal of libghc-warp-dev considering >> its tiny popcon and the fact that it has never been in a stable Debian >> release... > >I’m still have doubts if the severity is appropriate. The proportion of >clients sending such strange header is likely quite small, so this >sounds more like “a bug which has a major effect on the usability of a >package, without rendering it completely unusable to everyone.” i.e. >important.
In that case, drop the severity? I'm curious why you didn't do that already, in fact. >Or does anyone think that not having warp (and its reverse dependencies) >in is better than a version with incompatibility problems? Pass; I neither use nor develop in Haskell, I'm just trying to get the RC bug count down so we can get Wheezy released. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. st...@einval.com "It's actually quite entertaining to watch ag129 prop his foot up on the desk so he can get a better aim." [ seen in ucam.chat ] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
