On 27/01/2013 19:03, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 18:54:12 +0100, Jérémy Lal wrote:
>
>> diff -Nru varnish-3.0.2/debian/varnish.postinst
>> varnish-3.0.2/debian/varnish.postinst
>> --- varnish-3.0.2/debian/varnish.postinst 2012-05-01 16:22:42.000000000
>> +0200
>> +++ varnish-3.0.2/debian/varnish.postinst 2013-01-27 18:12:45.000000000
>> +0100
>> @@ -52,7 +52,12 @@
>> # varnish version 2.1.3-1 and older started varnishd at boot, we keep
>> # this default for upgrading clients
>> upgrade_enable_varnishd() {
>> - sed -i '/^START=/s/no/yes/g' /etc/default/varnish
>> + tmpFile=$(tempfile)
>> + sed '/^START=/s/no/yes/g' /etc/default/varnish > "${tmpFile}"
>> + if which ucf >/dev/null; then
>> + ucf --debconf-ok "${tmpFile}" /etc/default/varnish
>> + fi
>> + rm -f "${tmpFile}"
>> }
>>
>> case ${1:-} in
>
> That's horrible. varnish doesn't use ucf so far, there should be a better way
> to go about that.
Oh i was trying to fix the existing code, not remove it - which would
be a much better solution, along with a simple advice in NEWS.Debian, perhaps.
I'm curious why ucf is horrible, though.
Jérémy.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
