On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 16:07:53 +0100 Andreas Beckmann <a...@debian.org> wrote:
> On 2013-01-27 15:17, Neil Williams wrote: > > I've tried reproducing this again in a VM with gnome-core installed and > > again after installing gnome-dbg - without problems. > > > Please can #677407 be re-tested using libglib2.0-0 > > (= 2.33.12+really2.32.4-5) from unstable? > > squeeze/main/pass/gnome-dbg_1:2.30+7.log > wheezy/main/pass/gnome-dbg_1:3.4+7.log > sid/main/pass/gnome-dbg_1:3.4+7.log > > squeeze2wheezy/main/affected/gnome-dbg_1:3.4+7.log > squeeze2wheezy2sid/main/affected/gnome-dbg_1:3.4+7.log > > squeeze2sid/main/pass/gnome-dbg_1:3.4+7.log > testing2sid/main/pass/gnome-dbg_1:3.4+7.log > > looks good :-) > > If there is a repository somewhere with all the new .debs built from > source(libglib2.0-0) and a Packages file, I could do tests how this > would look like in a squeeze2wheezy upgrade after glib2 migrated to > testing. (I'm just to lazy to rebuild glib2 locally ...) No need to rebuild locally. I used reprepro to create a small repo and then used a filterlist to update from unstable against the list of binary packages built by glib2.0 http://linux.codehelp.co.uk/emdebian/dists/piuparts/ This is available, temporarily, as an apt source if you want it: deb http://linux.codehelp.co.uk/emdebian piuparts main (amd64 & i386 only) piuparts|main|amd64: libglib2.0-0 2.33.12+really2.32.4-5 piuparts|main|amd64: libglib2.0-0-dbg 2.33.12+really2.32.4-5 piuparts|main|amd64: libglib2.0-0-refdbg 2.33.12+really2.32.4-5 piuparts|main|amd64: libglib2.0-bin 2.33.12+really2.32.4-5 piuparts|main|amd64: libglib2.0-data 2.33.12+really2.32.4-5 piuparts|main|amd64: libglib2.0-dev 2.33.12+really2.32.4-5 piuparts|main|amd64: libglib2.0-doc 2.33.12+really2.32.4-5 glib2.0 | 2.33.12+really2.32.4-5 | sid | source That repository will be available for a few weeks or so. -- Neil Williams ============= http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
pgpQalfTnVgjX.pgp
Description: PGP signature
