Your message dated Mon, 07 Nov 2005 03:32:08 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#328749: fixed in xmltex 1.9-11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Sep 2005 08:13:07 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 17 01:13:07 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp05.web.de [217.72.192.209]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EGXop-00041v-00; Sat, 17 Sep 2005 01:13:07 -0700
Received: from [213.6.170.216] (helo=preusse.amasol.de)
by smtp05.web.de with asmtp (WEB.DE 4.105 #317)
id 1EGXoJ-00040b-00; Sat, 17 Sep 2005 10:12:36 +0200
Received: by preusse.amasol.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 17 Sep 2005
10:12:33 +0200
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 10:12:33 +0200
From: Hilmar Preusse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Debian-teTeX-maint <debian-tetex-maint@lists.debian.org>
Subject: package installation fails with teTeX 3.0
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mail-Followup-To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Debian-teTeX-maint <debian-tetex-maint@lists.debian.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
X-Operating-System: CYGWIN_NT-5.0 1.5.18(0.132/4/2) i686
X-Face: .n=jHnz:2pu0c0)ef]4O#1FE{Vak?h89!g7_#2+PzSRoIU[pJFNnz>gLhn}UMwv}4/j{X..
2E+>U>P!`PYk
X-Confirmation-Request: yes
X-Confirm-Reading-To: "Hilmar Preusse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,
HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: xmltex
Version: 1.9-10
Severity: normal
Hi,
Your package fails to install, when one has teTeX 3.0 from
experimental installed:
Setting up xmltex (1.9-10) ...
Replacing config file /etc/texmf/texmf.cnf with new version
texhash: Updating /usr/local/share/texmf/ls-R...
texhash: Updating /var/lib/texmf/ls-R-TEXMFMAIN...
texhash: Updating /var/cache/fonts/ls-R...
texhash: Updating /var/lib/texmf/ls-R...
texhash: Done.
Checking for TeX format files we depend on ... done.
Creating xmltex format files...
ERROR: XMLTeX memory dump (xmltex.efmt) cannot be found
ERROR: PDFXMLTeX memory dump (pdfxmltex.efmt) cannot be found
Trying fmtutil --all
ERROR: XMLTeX memory dump (xmltex.efmt) cannot be found
ERROR: PDFXMLTeX memory dump (pdfxmltex.efmt) cannot be found
*** ERROR: can't make xmltex fmt files, bailing
*** see /tmp/xmltex-postinst.Yt8T9q for details
dpkg: error processing xmltex (--configure):
subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Errors were encountered while processing:
xmltex
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
The cause is your code, which checks if the formats have been
created. It assumes (pdf)TeX to generate a file called
(pdf)xmltex.efmt if the e-TeX engine is used. That was changed in
teTeX 3.0 and there exists only (pdf)xmltex.fmt.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/var/lib/texmf/web2c# ls -l *xml*
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2019449 Sep 16 20:24 pdfxmltex.fmt
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2266 Sep 16 20:24 pdfxmltex.log
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2019314 Sep 16 20:24 xmltex.fmt
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2248 Sep 16 20:24 xmltex.log
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/var/lib/texmf/web2c# grep TeX pdfxmltex.log
This is pdfeTeX, Version 3.141592-1.21a-2.2 (Web2C 7.5.4) (format=pdflatex
2005. 9.11) 16 SEP 2005 20:24
This bug will become RC as soon as teTeX 3.0 hits unstable. The
upload will be done as soon as the RMs allow the next big
transition[TM].
Regards,
Hilmar
--
sigmentation fault
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 328749-close) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Nov 2005 11:36:25 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 07 03:36:25 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EZ5EO-0008Tv-00; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 03:32:08 -0800
From: Ardo van Rangelrooij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#328749: fixed in xmltex 1.9-11
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 03:32:08 -0800
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Source: xmltex
Source-Version: 1.9-11
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
xmltex, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
xmltex_1.9-11.diff.gz
to pool/main/x/xmltex/xmltex_1.9-11.diff.gz
xmltex_1.9-11.dsc
to pool/main/x/xmltex/xmltex_1.9-11.dsc
xmltex_1.9-11_all.deb
to pool/main/x/xmltex/xmltex_1.9-11_all.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Ardo van Rangelrooij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated xmltex package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 05:18:27 -0600
Source: xmltex
Binary: xmltex
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.9-11
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian XML/SGML Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Ardo van Rangelrooij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
xmltex - TeX package for processing XML files
Closes: 258974 328749 334736 336666 337405
Changes:
xmltex (1.9-11) unstable; urgency=low
.
* debian/postinst: Do not check for the created format files, because
the names have changed (and might change again). Instead, rely on
the return code of fmtutil, in accordance with the Debian TeX Policy
(closes: Bug#328749, Bug#334736)
* debian/postinst: Do not check for LaTeX/pdfLaTeX format files,
they are provided if tetex-bin is configured
* debian/control: Changed tetex-* dependencies
(closes: Bug#336666)
* debian/control: removed Graham Wilson from Uploaders per his request
* debian/rules: moved debhelper compatibility level into debian/compat
* debian/compat: set debhelper compatibility level to 4
(closes: Bug#337405)
* debian/rules: overhauled
* Added Makefile
* debian/dirs: folded into Makefile
* debian/conffiles: removed to prevent duplicate conffile indication
* Moved remaining debhelper files to debian/xmltex.*
* xmltex.1:
* changed '\\' into proper backslash '\[rs]'
(closes: Bug#258974)
* changed to correctly indicate the 'ntilde' character
* debian/copyright: updated to reflect current maintainer
* debian/control: upgraded to Debian Policy 3.6.2 (no changes)
Files:
9ea135260b95fdf5ca0ccc3f3c1c6650 796 tex optional xmltex_1.9-11.dsc
445ba8fd1190f60989f51f17ee8c02c3 10956 tex optional xmltex_1.9-11.diff.gz
a8c358bf37feb366a58bd1f0a1167b0d 197904 tex optional xmltex_1.9-11_all.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iQCVAwUBQ285kj6XMRfcxSjpAQLLagQAsEvtNnkORWBLG0hkyO5ef+N/p9gevcEh
Gw178FMr54MqZCcQeOurKj2xB+QsWIBUoosulVMFLJi2Sqd66ATqzh/Bz9OfjIx+
XFD0W6ZBL10jf3AMAWuJ2Ak2k8lbSE2Z/ChtWjC7WOK74FEkIWmxKXCFfK/DoXcE
OlKWRTGMVCE=
=gArG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
