On 8 January 2013 19:11, Ansgar Burchardt <ans...@debian.org> wrote: > Control: severity -1 serious > > Dmitrijs Ledkovs <x...@debian.org> writes: >> ecere-sdk and eclib packages both have binary package libec0. > > Two packages building the same binary is certainly a RC bug. > >> Both are "Library for modular symbols and elliptic curves over Q", but I >> am not sure if the two packages are the same or different sources, and >> how to name them. > > No, eclib's libec0 says that, but the one from ecere-sdk says "eC > Compiler Library", see [1]. > > [1] <http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=libec0> >
Ah, thanks for this link. I must have mixed up the pages I was looking at. >> The options are: >> 1) ecere-sdk drops the package & build-deps on the eclib one >> 2) eclib is dropped in favor of ecere-sdk >> 3) ecere-sdk renames its libec0 to something else >> 4) eclib renames its libec0 to something else >> 5) both rename libec0 to something else, and possibly both Provides: >> libec0 (if compatible) > > Just from the package description they seem to be completly unrelated > libraries. > In that case ecere-sdk should probably use a different name for that package. libecec?! since the .so file is already in /usr/lib/.*/ec/libec.so >> Also, we should decide above in context when/where we want to implement >> this: wheezy and jessie. BTW Ubuntu already synced both packages, so the >> clash is more evident there. > > Both packages are not in testing, so there is nothing to deal with for > wheezy. > Cool. Regards, Dmitrijs. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
