Hi, On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 09:15:41PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote: > On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 04:54:01PM +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote: > > Subject says it all. I'm tempted to think that at least the mips and > > i386 failures were just a transient failure and the builds should just > > be reattempted. > > > > But I may be mistaken > > Yep. It already looked reproducible and the build for i386 again didn't > work. Also I don't know why you're copying hurd-i386, because that one > doesn't look transient at all.
For mips, it seems the build failed because the testsuite was started, which normally doesn't happen on mips. This is caused by this test on_buildd := $(shell [ -f /CurrentlyBuilding -o "$$LOGNAME" = buildd ] && echo yes) On corelli2, LOGNAME is 'buildd2', and so (as can be seen in the build log) the testsuite was started. So for the mips build, a new attempt might solve the problem. I guess a new attempt on sparc could also be tried, but I don't have any idea what's going wrong there. On i386, I tried the build several times with pbuilder, and it succeeds every time. This was on an amd64 kernel. Both buildd failures were on biber. Maybe it should be tried on another buildd? Cheers, Ivo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
