Hi Serafeim (Warning: I'm not part of the release-team)
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 09:39:51PM +0100, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote: > On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 08:22:30PM +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > On Wed, 2012-12-12 at 19:32 +0000, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote: > > > cflow (1:1.4+dfsg1-1) unstable; urgency=high > > > . > > > * Repackage with non DFSG-free texinfo files stripped out of the > > > source and > > > binary package (closes: #695715). > > > > Thanks for fixing this. Unfortunately, the fact that you also made this > > change: > > > > > * Raise debhelper compatibility level to 9 and update the debhelper > > > version > > > dependency, to enable security hardening > > > > means the package is unlikely to get unblocked. fwiw, this is explicitly > > mentioned in "rule #1" on > > http://release.debian.org/wheezy/freeze_policy.html > > oh sorry about that :-/ > > Shall I target the new release to unstable or testing-proposed-updates? (in > the case of the latter, I'll post a diff before doing the upload). IMHO, best would be to revert the changes not following the freeze policy, so that the package can go trough the unstable upload to testing directly, without the need of a separate t-p-u upload. Regards, Salvatore
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
