Hi Keith, intrigeri wrote (29 Oct 2012 21:19:47 GMT) : > Otherwise, this patch seems fine to me. Nice job!
> Tagging patch accordingly: I propose we fix this bug that way, and > clone/reassign/whatever to the policy if there's still disagreement, > or need for clarification, on how to interpret the "local changes to > configuration files must not be overridden" idea as far as symlinks > are concerned. I intend to fix the #684923 RC bug with a NMU of fontconfig that would apply the proposed patch and the few improvements I suggested. Do you see any problem with the proposed solution, or have plans to fix it yourself, or see any other reason why a NMU would be a bad idea? Cheers, -- intrigeri | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
