-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Hi,
Thanks for this fast response. Am Mo den 19. Nov 2012 um 11:50 schrieb Didier 'OdyX' Raboud: > Le lundi, 19 novembre 2012 10.51:21, Klaus Ethgen a écrit : > > The last patch to fix #691422 will break init scripts of unrelated > > software like for example exim. Please roll it back. I set the severity > > to critical for this reason; breaking unrelated software. > > As I can't verify your assertion here, using Wheezy's exim's initscript, and > as: > > $ grep pidofproc /etc/init.d/exim4 > if pidofproc -p "$QRPIDFILE" >/dev/null; then > if pidofproc -p "$PIDFILE" >/dev/null; then > > Could you please detail your "will break init scripts of unrelated software" > ? > (tagging as +moreinfo) Well, /etc/init.d/exim4 status end with return code 4 after the update; in any cases. (That was how I saw it, as puppet do use it to see if the daemon is running.) > As discussed in #691422, pidofproc was never meant to be used with a > different > arguments order, I do not know about the intended use. I never dig into pidofproc before. I just know that exim init script (and maybe other) is broken after updating lsb-base. > so I think it's not an lsb-base responsibility if other init scripts > wrongly using it now fail when it enforces a correct behaviour. That might be. But shouldn't it be checked before make an incompatible change and notifying the relevant maintainers? > For now, I'm downgrading this to serious. No problem with that. I set the severity just according the corresponding notes in bugreport. Regards Klaus - -- Klaus Ethgen http://www.ethgen.ch/ pub 4096R/4E20AF1C 2011-05-16 Klaus Ethgen <kl...@ethgen.de> Fingerprint: 85D4 CA42 952C 949B 1753 62B3 79D0 B06F 4E20 AF1C -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQGcBAEBCgAGBQJQqhheAAoJEKZ8CrGAGfasbSQL/itOziu1sWYhK26zn9H8I24a X86+gM5FEHNro4FL/EwbrusiMZLgWSKtm0Lm4akSeySMmsRhrDbZdyiN2KoioFhG AYXEo5uNcemslRIx9fjWw6EhAj8b4+51ft/Z0Y4FnKrY1VlM6hlBGYmNYoS7X+/K xWT/5+JQLQs8ALJtFPnj9W6LVzucbsXp3pCLQ5jqxUjeAsmbUExvYAwylKJhk5ty iMHQSaNDxZYExdZJChZiXEs/odRPsuak0WhKzgJftnV+UF3oMGkmc8FCLc3oojny yRPfRtIb67VGH1FGWI3RaXrgxNq60/xxfr/SV7+W/xiYvug7kbxJYSioUfUGjoWW kSJC7hJ5NcZduABCWZeYDq4mddjN+9sQfjo8M7vYZGk2iPJRbmDSIUuOR+rS6iGH KY0HrpwVXv8zeQBU4wMsg9Llll7yCg2OhnB05KxkIulBEKbVTLAPNcaRIcA6OLlS rsDO346w9wErVn3gfvE/a3g4Ln3gYcaJgPv0Yhe+Vg== =xJdv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
