Hi,
Michael Gilbert wrote (13 Nov 2012 00:09:04 GMT) :
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 6:30 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
>> Isn't this bug just a dupe of 684293, in which case it doesn't need
>> an os-prober change?
> Possibly. I've never been able to reproduce the issue myself, so
> deferring to Integeri: #684293 is fixed in kernels > 3.2.29,
> was your testing done on an earlier version than this
Possibly.
> and if so can you test with a newer kernel?
With linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64 (3.2.32-1) from current Wheezy,
* I can reproduce the issue I've described on #680084 with stock
os-prober 1.56
* I can't reproduce it with my patch applied.
So, it does not look like a duplicate of #684293.
> In the meantime, I've canceled the nmu since it may not be needed.
IIRC Cyril wanted to review my patch, so you might want to check with
him before NMU'ing again.
@Michael: you mistyped my email address into "integeri",
but luckily I was subscribed to the bug :)
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
