Le Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 02:57:45PM +0100, Andreas Tille a écrit : > > it is true that /usr/share/doc/cdd-dev does not contain a copyright file > because it is simply a symlink to /usr/share/doc/blends-dev and the > transitional (=empty) package cdd-dev depends from blends-dev. So while > the report is correct I would consider an upload at current time simply > causing work for several people just to follow some rules with no profit > for anybody. I'd suggest to lower the priority of the bug and leave the > package as is. > > What do you think?
Hi Andreas, if /usr/share/doc/cdd-dev were a symlink to /usr/share/doc/blends-dev, then piuparts would have found the copyright file. I think that what piuparts seems to have found, is that when upgrading from lenny to squeeze to wheezy, /usr/share/doc/cdd-dev does not become a symlink : > > MISSING COPYRIGHT FILE: /usr/share/doc/cdd-dev/copyright > > drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 40 Nov 10 07:33 /usr/share/doc/cdd-dev > > total 0 > > drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 40 Nov 10 07:33 . > > drwxr-xr-x 126 root root 2660 Nov 10 07:35 .. This really looks like an empty directory. I would agree to downgrade the bug (cdd-dev is transitional and native, there is anyway not copyrighted work to look for in this package), but is the breakage limited to /usr/share/doc/cdd-dev/ ? Cheers, -- Charles Plessy Debian Med packaging team, http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
