Hi, Kevin Ryde wrote (07 Jun 2012 00:30:38 GMT) : > Hendrik Tews <hend...@askra.de> writes: >> This makes the requirement in the Debian Emacs policy >> an absurdity.
> Yes as it stands but a bug of the implementation. I think the > concept of keeping the /usr/local sysadmin's things ahead of > packages is sound. I concur. FWIW, what seemed to me like a trivial potential fix that was worth trying (despite having possible undesirable side effects): - (let ((new-path (append paths load-path))) + (let ((new-path (append load-path paths))) and - (setq load-path (append add-on-package-paths old-load-path)))))) + (setq load-path (append old-load-path add-on-package-paths)))))) ... does not seem to work: regardless of whether that patch is applied or not, "emacs -q" gives me the same load-path. Given I got the same results in my testing of Kevin's patch on #454778, I'm wondering if my testing method is correct... Cheers, -- intrigeri | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
