Your message dated Tue, 1 Nov 2005 23:50:21 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in upload of pilot-link 0.11.8-0.12.0-pre4-2 to 
experimental
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Nov 2005 16:59:05 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 01 08:59:05 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (garfield.codehelp) [82.152.193.77] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1EWzTU-0006fd-00; Tue, 01 Nov 2005 08:59:05 -0800
Received: from neil by garfield.codehelp with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
        id 1EWzT1-0005r2-00; Tue, 01 Nov 2005 16:58:35 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libpisock-dev: False dependency on libpisock++0 prevents upload of 
other
 packages
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17
Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2005 16:58:35 +0000
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: libpisock-dev
Version: 0.11.8-0.12.0-pre4-1
Severity: serious
Tags: experimental
Justification: Policy 7.2


libpisock-dev lists a dependency on libpisock++0 in Debian experimental
but the libpisock++ package isn't in Debian experimental and the libpisock++ 
directory doesn't exist in pilot-link source for 0.12. 

AFAICT libpisock-dev (0.12-pre5) does not actually depend on libpisock++ at all.

I can't proceed with even an upload of my pilot-qof package into
experimental with libpisock-dev dependent on libpisock++0 
as it halts a clean build.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.4.25-1-686
Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages libpisock-dev depends on:
ii  libncurses5-dev [li 5.5-1                Developer's libraries and docs for
ii  libpisock++0        0.11.8-10            C++ library for communicating with
ii  libpisock9          0.11.8-0.12.0-pre4-1 library for communicating with a P
ii  libpisync0          0.11.8-0.12.0-pre4-1 synchronization library for PalmOS

libpisock-dev recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 336853-done) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Nov 2005 22:50:26 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 01 14:50:26 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp3-g19.free.fr [212.27.42.29] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1EX4xW-0000z5-00; Tue, 01 Nov 2005 14:50:26 -0800
Received: from acer.maison.bogus (au113-1-82-235-203-188.fbx.proxad.net 
[82.235.203.188])
        by smtp3-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id A09EC371B8;
        Tue,  1 Nov 2005 23:50:25 +0100 (CET)
Received: from rousseau by acer.maison.bogus with local (Exim 4.54)
        id 1EX4xR-00021v-VE; Tue, 01 Nov 2005 23:50:21 +0100
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 23:50:21 +0100
From: Ludovic Rousseau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Fixed in upload of pilot-link 0.11.8-0.12.0-pre4-2 to experimental
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,RCVD_IN_SORBS 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2

Le Tuesday 01 November 2005 =E0 14:34:12, Ludovic Rousseau a =E9crit:
> tag 336853 + fixed-in-experimental
>=20
> quit

This bug affected experimental only so is now completely fixed.

--=20
 Dr. Ludovic Rousseau                        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 -- Normaliser Unix c'est comme pasteuriser le camembert, L.R. --


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to