reassign 667751 libgda-5.0-4 found 667751 5.0.3-1 thanks On 08.10.2012 16:59, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Julien Cristau <jcris...@debian.org> (03/08/2012): >> On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 13:11:35 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: >> >>> On 02.08.2012 21:52, Julien Cristau wrote: >>> >>>> I think linking /usr/lib/libgda-5.0/providers/libgda-sqlite.so against >>>> -lsqlite3 directly would be the safest course. >>> >>> Would changing libgda to link directly against libsqlite be something >>> the release team considers ok for an unblock? >>> >> I guess it'll slightly depend how the diff looks (and if somebody has >> time to implement this, of course), but yes that would be the preferred >> solution as far as I'm concerned. > > Here's a patch. Tested: build OK, added dependency on libsqlite3.so.0 > (objdump), added Depends on libsqlite3-0. > > No run-time test at all. > > Sorry for the patch name, but dpkg-buildpackage -S and debdiff should > be enough. Really. The changelog entry wants to be improved too.
Thanks KiBi for the patch! Since we agreed to address this issue in libgda, I'm reassigning this bug report. When I was talking about linking directly against libsqlite I was actually thinking about replacing dlopen with directly linking against libsqlite. This was a non-trivial patch when I looked at it. Your patch is much simpler, so probably better suited for an upload targetted at wheezy and it basically does what we want, so I'll go with that. Cheers, Michael -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
