Your message dated Tue, 01 Nov 2005 09:59:38 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line xfs-xtt removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Oct 2005 22:24:41 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 23 15:24:41 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from blabluga.hell.pl [62.121.102.27] (Debian-exim)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1EToGf-0000HF-00; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 15:24:41 -0700
Received: from szczaw.czesiu.lan ([192.168.109.13])
        by blabluga.hell.pl with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
        (Exim 4.54)
        id 1EToGb-00073T-UY; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 00:24:38 +0200
Received: from arturcz by szczaw.czesiu.lan with local (Exim 4.54)
        id 1EToFO-0005mZ-O2; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 00:23:22 +0200
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 00:23:22 +0200
From: "Artur R. Czechowski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: xfs-xtt: Uninstallable - typo in postinst script
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.17
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
X-Spam-Score-bl: -1.4 (-)
X-Spam-Report-bl: Content analysis details:   (-1.4 points, 5.0 required)
        pts rule name              description
        ---- ---------------------- ----------------------------------------
        -1.4 ALL_TRUSTED            Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
X-Scan-Signature-bl: 3a81ac6f9828927212ded09314382187
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: xfs-xtt
Version: 1:1.4.1.xf430-6
Severity: serious

During installation I noticed following message:
Setting up xfs-xtt (1.4.1.xf430-6) ...
chown: `xfntserv:xfntserv': invalid user
dpkg: error processing xfs-xtt (--configure):
 subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Errors were encountered while processing:
 xfs-xtt
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
A package failed to install.  Trying to recover:
Setting up xfs-xtt (1.4.1.xf430-6) ...
xfntsrv already exists.

postinst script contains:

if id xfntsrv > /dev/null 2> /dev/null; then
    echo 'xfntsrv already exists.'
else
    adduser --quiet --system --group --no-create-home --home 
/var/log/fontservers --gecos "X font server" --disabled-password 
--disabled-login xfntsrv
    if [ ! -e /var/log/fontservers ] ; then
        mkdir -p /var/log/fontservers
    fi
    chown -R xfntserv:xfntserv /var/log/fontservers
fi

Please notice, that existence of xfntsrv is checked and also xfntsrv
user and group are added. Then chown tries to use xfntserv name.

Regards
        Artur

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-amd64-generic
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=pl_PL (charmap=ISO-8859-2)

Versions of packages xfs-xtt depends on:
ii  adduser                       3.74       Add and remove users and groups
ii  debconf                       1.4.58     Debian configuration management sy
ii  libc6                         2.3.5-7    GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  zlib1g                        1:1.2.3-6  compression library - runtime

xfs-xtt recommends no packages.

-- debconf information excluded

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 335429-done) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Nov 2005 09:00:02 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 01 01:00:02 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.irb.hr [161.53.22.8] (UNKNOWN)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1EWrzt-0008Vs-00; Tue, 01 Nov 2005 01:00:02 -0800
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (diziet.irb.hr [161.53.22.31])
        by mail.irb.hr (8.13.3/8.13.3/Debian-6) with ESMTP id jA18xaxh019929;
        Tue, 1 Nov 2005 09:59:36 +0100
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (localhost [127.0.0.1])
        by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.5/8.13.5/Debian-3) with ESMTP id jA18xcvD014743;
        Tue, 1 Nov 2005 09:59:38 +0100
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
        by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id jA18xcXI014741;
        Tue, 1 Nov 2005 09:59:38 +0100
From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: xfs-xtt removed
Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2005 09:59:38 +0100
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.8
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,SORTED_RECIPS 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

xfs-xtt has been removed from Debian having been superseded by X.Org.
For details, see <http://bugs.debian.org/314882>.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to