tags 687604 + pending
thanks

Dear maintainer,

Sebastian Ramacher has prepared an NMU for libkdtree++ (versioned as
0.7.0-1.1) and I've uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to
tell me if I should delay it longer.

Regards.

-- 
 .''`.  Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06
 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer  -  http://www.debian.org/
 `. `'  Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe
   `-   NP: Chavela Vargas: En El Ultimo Trago
diff -u libkdtree++-0.7.0/debian/changelog libkdtree++-0.7.0/debian/changelog
--- libkdtree++-0.7.0/debian/changelog
+++ libkdtree++-0.7.0/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+libkdtree++ (0.7.0-1.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Cherry pick 8d4fbb9a from upstream to fix issues with g++ 4.7. (Closes:
+    #687604)
+
+ -- Sebastian Ramacher <s.ramac...@gmx.at>  Tue, 25 Sep 2012 16:57:06 +0200
+
 libkdtree++ (0.7.0-1) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * New upstream release (closes: Bug#506485)
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- libkdtree++-0.7.0.orig/kdtree++/kdtree.hpp
+++ libkdtree++-0.7.0/kdtree++/kdtree.hpp
@@ -1163,7 +1163,7 @@
       {
          typename _Base::NoLeakAlloc noleak(this);
          _Link_type new_node = noleak.get();
-         _M_construct_node(new_node, __V, __PARENT, __LEFT, __RIGHT);
+	 _Base::_M_construct_node(new_node, __V, __PARENT, __LEFT, __RIGHT);
          noleak.disconnect();
          return new_node;
       }
@@ -1181,8 +1181,8 @@
       void
       _M_delete_node(_Link_type __p)
       {
-        _M_destroy_node(__p);
-        _M_deallocate_node(__p);
+	_Base::_M_destroy_node(__p);
+        _Base::_M_deallocate_node(__p);
       }
 
       _Link_type _M_root;

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to