Your message dated Thu, 13 Sep 2012 13:23:07 -0700
with message-id 
<caczd_tdmt6orsr0zhrrebtj6gm3npcvkf1d2kwghdsmgg8u...@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#687386: 0ad: Uninstallable in unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #687386,
regarding 0ad: Uninstallable in unstable
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
687386: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=687386
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: 0ad
Version: 0~r11863-2
Severity: serious
Tags: sid

0ad-data has been updated to alpha 11, rendering 0ad
uninstallable. Please fix this.

(and the SVN for 0ad-data has not been updated either,
 that should probably be fixed as well)

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 
'stable'), (100, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.utf8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages 0ad depends on:
pn  0ad-data                   <none>
pn  gamin                      <none>
pn  libboost-filesystem1.42.0  <none>
pn  libboost-signals1.42.0     <none>
pn  libboost-system1.42.0      <none>
ii  libc6                      2.13-35
ii  libcurl3                   7.27.0-1
pn  libdevil1c2                <none>
pn  libenet0debian1            <none>
ii  libfam0                    2.7.0-17
ii  libgcc1                    1:4.7.1-7
ii  libgl1-mesa-glx [libgl1]   8.0.4-2
pn  libilmbase6                <none>
pn  libjpeg62                  <none>
ii  libopenal1                 1:1.14-4
pn  libopenexr6                <none>
ii  libpng12-0                 1.2.49-3
ii  libsdl1.2debian            1.2.15-5
ii  libstdc++6                 4.7.1-7
ii  libtiff4                   3.9.6-7
ii  libvorbisfile3             1.3.2-1.3
ii  libwxbase2.8-0             2.8.12.1-11
ii  libwxgtk2.8-0              2.8.12.1-11
ii  libx11-6                   2:1.5.0-1
ii  libxml2                    2.8.0+dfsg1-5
ii  zlib1g                     1:1.2.7.dfsg-13

0ad recommends no packages.

0ad suggests no packages.

-- 
Julian Andres Klode  - Debian Developer, Ubuntu Member

See http://wiki.debian.org/JulianAndresKlode and http://jak-linux.org/.

Attachment: pgpAsfbuS5vPc.pgp
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.0.11-1

On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 9:01 AM, Moritz Muehlenhoff <j...@inutil.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 12:47:50PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
>> Package: 0ad
>> Version: 0~r11863-2
>> Severity: serious
>> Tags: sid
>>
>> 0ad-data has been updated to alpha 11, rendering 0ad
>> uninstallable. Please fix this.
>>
>> (and the SVN for 0ad-data has not been updated either,
>>  that should probably be fixed as well)
>
> Should 0ad really be included in Wheezy? At this point it's very much work
> in progress. People should rather install a backport of the 1.0 release
> later than some outdated development snapshot.

FWIW, my opinion as 0ad's maintainer is that it's already reached a
state where it is stable enough and has developed a large enough
feature set for it to be included in Wheezy.

(Anyways, alpha 11 is now in sid and is installable, so I'm closing
this bug. Sorry for the delay!)

Regards,
Vincent

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to