On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 09:00:50PM +0100, Nicholas Bamber wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > Peterm > So the bad news is that the build daemons got in a mess. The good > news is that at least one FTP person thinks this will clear in about > 24 hours and then the build daemons will start building gforth. > > If that fails I guess you'll have to remove the build dependency on > gforth and have some horrendous patch of the regenerated versions of > those files.
And it worked! Thanks a bunch! To the other CC'd DDs - yes, there was an e-mail that I sent that you may have missed due to some awful e-mail misconfiguration at my hosting provider that has hopefully been fixed since :( You can take a look at the log of #672616 for my September 6 message - but it's OK now, since Nicholas took care of it. Thanks to all of you for your work, on Debian and otherwise! G'luck, Peter > On 10/09/12 22:25, Nicholas Bamber wrote: > > Peter, I started looking at gforth again. I'll let you know. > > > > On 07/09/12 22:45, Peter Pentchev wrote: > >> On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 10:36:04PM +0100, Nicholas Bamber wrote: > >>> Peter, If noone else does I will certainly endeavour to get > >>> this into wheezy. I probably won't get round to until later > >>> next week which gives the others a chance if they have more > >>> time. > >>> > >>> By the way I didn't get the email which is I guess another > >>> thing I'll have to look at. > > > >> Thank you! > > > >> Yes, it is quite possible that something went wrong with my > >> sending the e-mail; I hope this one gets through better. > > > >> G'luck, Peter -- Peter Pentchev r...@ringlet.net r...@freebsd.org pe...@packetscale.com PGP key: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc Key fingerprint FDBA FD79 C26F 3C51 C95E DF9E ED18 B68D 1619 4553 What would this sentence be like if it weren't self-referential?
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
