-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Control: tags -1 - pending
Le 09/09/2012 23:14, Michael Gilbert a écrit : > It is not good practice to include fixes for multiple cve's in the > same patch I simply followed the example from stable-security that fixed the relevant issues a month ago. > (i.e. how do we tell which is which in the future, and what > if upstream only fixes some) Already fixed upstream, as documented in the patch. > so I would rather see this as-is canceled, Done > I was going to do work on that within the next week anyway. Good, I let it to you then. Regards David -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJQTV3MAAoJELgqIXr9/gnyf4oP/RetYNyrQrfOuiCHAlfXO+MI +mhsyVUpT061un2x8ZD5rEPHo7XCUjhelgXgbMjc+bK8V8ZqHY8sa4lNhDYJq9zn LOguIaLbmURtCRQtomlo4FczKayLA5ghTJRlfe4eS7SHBh2Ab4xSWjz8SRY+omdt oBl1Zqet+LXBC5vYRKAFOfRe17uUnzUyGqINAc/Pt587ZTfHsb9r7X8YtMcTr4MW nCOJiafw2ApFKw/xF6eQDFRzLNaU/0Uy///9i2uhuOuw82fqeY40fwniHNtTCPJo mdswz3Ag8vt0grqTQJbVawA8LKIsEGTvmXZ9rG0K9f5GBuxfXsZuf1IoCjfLwlUq yMQKfYgdAZ5qAQJuWlDoHCI44UQl9Npi8gQwaEGNkrbAVDy9Eyjo8BoeTO/fwXxv s8F9JXKxy2w1dCsBOHFojn6hFX2NNhBOrEXFzh/p2HJx7w0bbTMTBA1FEBDLOy8g o85BiCI+HcAEBIwb/mC3m04RCVzCgpGWtCLcGUEyNTCCldBcR+Kw5MgKmEmkMuLV K1ULScDRwXcZSFVyIM+CkytTkMtGoPoKcJGSBLCvaBMzxRAXJHXcoTZuKxJF6kYb 8a/j2jEyRc3Dp3P4LsrePzpJWvR955DeaxBRxu51b8RvBAGgcZFRoBHCTXogGb4v o/2RJEpTU+sRWe5FUVX0 =L8dP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
