On Mon, 2012-08-27 at 22:06 -0700, tony mancill wrote: > On 08/18/2012 05:03 AM, Neil Williams wrote: > > Just to help those scanning the RC bug lists, the binNMU request for > > bobcat is #683244. The binNMU for c++-annotations would need to be > > requested later. > > > > I've done a simple test in a pbuilder chroot and the principle of the > > request does fix these two RC bugs. [...] > Thank you for verifying the proposed binNMU. Any advice on how to > proceed with this for bobcat from the maintainer perspective?
We'd still like to know what actually caused the issue, really. "Some unknown issue that seems to have gone away now" doesn't fill one with huge amounts of confidence. In any case, to keep things moving I've scheduled binNMUs for bobcat. Note that binNMUs can't close bugs, so if the binNMUs are successful then you'll need to take care of closing #683049 yourself. If further binNMUs for c++-annotations are still required, please request those via a new bug, once the bobcat binNMUs have successfully built everywhere. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
