Your message dated Fri, 31 Aug 2012 23:13:29 +0100
with message-id <1346451209.7606.44.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#683560: unblock: base-files/6.11
has caused the Debian Bug report #678106,
regarding base-files: dummy bug, please ignore
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
678106: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=678106
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: base-files
Version: 6.11
Severity: serious

If this release reaches testing before initscripts 2.88dsf-27, the
following will happen to anybody installing a new system from scratch:

base-files creates /etc/motd as a real file.

initscripts in testing removes the first line of /etc/motd to create
/etc/motd.tail

Then, when you upgrade to initscripts in unstable, the file
/etc/motd.tail is moved back to /etc/motd.

The problem with this is that the /etc/motd which is created by
base-files 6.11 already has the first line trimmed (i.e. it is already
in "motd.tail format").

I could have avoided this by using a Breaks: but such relation is too strong.
It is ok to have base-files 6.11 and initscripts 2.88dsf-22.1 in the system
as far as you bootstrapped the system with base-files 6.9 or earlier.


So, this is a dummy bug to prevent base-files 6.11 to enter testing.
Should be closed as soon as initscripts 2.88dsf-27 or later reaches testing.
If they enter testing at the same time, even better.



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Fri, 2012-08-31 at 21:48 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> sysvinit -31 has been unblocked, so I've also unblocked base-files;
> thanks.

Clearly I missed #678106, so base-files didn't migrate in tonight's
brintey run; closing it with this mail, so it should hit testing
tomorrow.

Regards,

Adam

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to