Your message dated Sun, 30 Oct 2005 02:38:20 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#336415: upgrade-reports: 'Conflicts/Pre-Depends' error 
when upgrading e2fsprogs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Oct 2005 05:43:21 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 29 22:43:21 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.201] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1EW5yT-00026l-00; Sat, 29 Oct 2005 22:43:21 -0700
Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id s13so314977wxc
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 29 Oct 2005 22:43:19 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        
h=received:content-type:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:from:to:subject:x-mailer:date:message-id;
        
b=I6zXFuBaLRjZMEWXU12T+UY5gFO76n9AgPSoq5T8b63q+k7XbHNZEPH7TIZpk0/kwX90I9+qh3VF9IiqkzZBpBMk0ohniMPElWRxF9WnlsskDvs+tSksyu/00XBUwwnaUjwqol6TcNjPGQFF2+7PjaAkrz5DLkREG50yPmNNaA4=
Received: by 10.65.231.12 with SMTP id i12mr594791qbr;
        Sat, 29 Oct 2005 22:43:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ( [172.164.48.101])
        by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id e14sm986947qba.2005.10.29.22.43.17;
        Sat, 29 Oct 2005 22:43:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] ident=yitzhak)
        by localhost.localdomain with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
        id 1EW5y5-0002Fg-BB; Sun, 30 Oct 2005 01:42:57 -0400
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Yitzhak Grossman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: upgrade-reports: 'Conflicts/Pre-Depends' error when upgrading e2fsprogs
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.15
Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 01:42:56 -0400
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
        RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: upgrade-reports
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable


Trying to upgrade e2fsprogs from version 1.35-6 to version 1.38-2 failed with a 
'Pre-Depends / Conflicts' error and a suggestion that enabling 
APT::Force-LoopBreak might work. According to man apt.conf(5):

 Force-LoopBreak
              Never Enable this option unless you -really- know what you are 
doing. It  per-
              mits  APT to temporarily remove an essential package to break a 
Conflicts/Con-
              flicts or Conflicts/Pre-Depend loop between two  essential  
packages.  SUCH  A
              LOOP  SHOULD  NEVER  EXIST  AND  IS  A GRAVE BUG. This option 
will work if the
              essential packages are not tar, gzip, libc, dpkg, bash or 
anything that  those
              packages depend on.

I therefore report this 'GRAVE BUG' :).
I subsequently enabled Force-LoopBreak and the upgrade proceeded smoothly. I 
posted to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and another user reported the identical experience 
with his e2fsprogs upgrade.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i586)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-2-386
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 336416-done) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Oct 2005 10:38:21 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 30 02:38:21 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net (tennyson.dodds.net) 
[66.93.39.86] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1EWAZx-0001Ij-00; Sun, 30 Oct 2005 02:38:21 -0800
Received: by tennyson.dodds.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id 87A387002; Sun, 30 Oct 2005 02:38:20 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 02:38:20 -0800
From: Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Yitzhak Grossman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#336415: upgrade-reports: 'Conflicts/Pre-Depends' error when 
upgrading e2fsprogs
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="SqGHvGqRphKoTacN"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02


--SqGHvGqRphKoTacN
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 01:34:47AM -0400, Yitzhak Grossman wrote:
> Package: upgrade-reports
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable

> Trying to upgrade e2fsprogs from version 1.35-6 to version 1.38-2 failed
> with a 'Pre-Depends / Conflicts' error and a suggestion that enabling
> APT::Force-LoopBreak might work. According to man apt.conf(5):

> I therefore report this 'GRAVE BUG' :).

This bug does not occur when upgrading from sarge.  The version of e2fsprogs
shipped with sarge is 1.37-2sarge1, not 1.35-6.  Upgrading to etch directly
=66rom pre-releases of sarge is not supported; you should upgrade to a clean
version of sarge before upgrading to testing again.

> I subsequently enabled Force-LoopBreak and the upgrade proceeded smoothly.

This is definitely not recommended.

Regards,
--=20
Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                                   http://www.debian.org/

--SqGHvGqRphKoTacN
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDZKKcKN6ufymYLloRArukAKCV+t1+E6NEtkYRSHYCdACbOsfWXQCgxaCv
+3ZItksk7jbUP77BuxG5VyU=
=ydKT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--SqGHvGqRphKoTacN--


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to