On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 6:47 PM, Raphael Geissert <geiss...@debian.org> wrote: > One day later than expected...
(Several days later than expected …) > On Tuesday 21 August 2012 10:56:06 Raphael Geissert wrote: >> If you do consider those cases, then Breaks should probably be used >> instead. Recommends is not enough even for the scenario where this bug >> was reproduced: grml - recommends are disabled by default. >> >> I haven't tested a squeeze->wheezy upgrade with Breaks, though. Will try >> to get around it today so that I can report back... > > It went fine. APT of course had to be deconfigured due to the Breaks, but it > was handled just fine. > > I used a Breaks: apt (<< 0.9.4~). Which is after a bit of thinking not that surprising: libapt-pkg is already unpacked and configured before apt is unpacked anyway (as APT handles itself as essential), so the solution we arrive at is more or less the same - good to know that at least sometimes theory isn't disproved by the implementation. :) Scheduled for 0.9.7.5 ETA: After we know what will happen with 0.9.7.4 (#685155) Best regards David Kalnischkies -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
