On 26/08/12 at 16:57 -0400, David Prévot wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > Hi, > > Le 26/08/2012 13:28, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit : > > On 25/08/12 at 19:11 -0400, David Prévot wrote: > >> Le 14/08/2012 03:18, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit : > >>> Source: backbone > >> […] > >>> Justification: FTBFS in wheezy on amd64 > > >> Actually its an OR dependency: > >> > >> libnode-uglify | yui-compressor > > > By default, sbuild ignores alternative build-dependencies (a | b) > > Thanks for your quick answer, and thanks Jonas who was even quicker, > preparing a t-p-u right now. > > >> I've tagged a few FTBFS on wheezy as unreproducible (because I didn't > >> investigate why it failed ten days ago, or because I couldn't find an > >> obvious reason), should I simply have closed them? > > > > Did you Cc me? I have very little time for Debian recently, but try to > > keep up with bugmail where I'm Cced. > > No, sorry about that, those were #684833, #684837 and #684860. Cédric > already looked at the last one with the same result than me, and should > investigate again soon. > > > Anyway, a good way to make progress is usually to provide a build log, > > and a diff between my log and your log. > > Thanks for the tip, I'll try to have a second look at the first two, > following your advice.
OK, the first two look like bugs that will be easier to understand with a diff (maybe a build-dep that was broken was fixed in the meantime?). For the third one, I'm a bit more puzzled. Note that I auto-retry builds before filing, so when I file a bug, it means that the build failed twice in a row. This does not exclude chroot configuration issues, or environment issues, but at least excludes all random/cosmic rays problems. Lucas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
