Package: ruby-gherkin Version: 2.11.1-1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) Subject: ruby-gherkin: FTBFS on armel, armhf, powerpc, s390, and s390x X-Debbugs-CC: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Hi, shawn escreveu isso aí: > On Wed, 2012-08-08 at 17:19 +0200, Cédric Boutillier wrote: > > Hi! > > > > ruby-gherkin does not build on the current architectures: armel, armhf, > > powerpc, s390 and s390x. Since I do not have access to any of these > > architectures, I was wondering if someone else had any clue about why > > the compilation fails (the failing tests are the same on all these > > architectures). > > Without having looked at the code, this list of failing architectures > makes me almost certain it is a problem of assuming the C type "char" is > signed. The easy fix is to change the offending "char" declaration > "signed char". > > Look at this table: > > http://wiki.debian.org/ArchitectureSpecificsMemo > > > > See > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=ruby-gherkin > > for details. > > > > This build failure is responsible for not having the new version of > > ruby-gherkin in testing, which is in turn blocking cucumber... > > > > Thanks in advance for your insights. > > > > Cédric I requested the installation of the build deps for ruby-gherkin in a armhf porterbox to be able to investigate. This far into the freeze, it's very unlikely that we will get this newer ruby-gherkin and the newer cucumber into wheezy, though. -- Antonio Terceiro <terce...@debian.org>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
