Le dimanche, 29 juillet 2012 15.40:19, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > On 12-07-29 at 02:33pm, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > > Le dimanche, 29 juillet 2012 14.20:45, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud a écrit : > > > A nice solution to this bug is IMHO to replicate in ghostscript-cups > > > what has been done for most packages shipping Cups drivers: > > > transform the postinst code into a dpkg trigger and let the Cups > > > postinst do the job "as cups". > > > > I shall also mention that this is already implemented in Ubuntu's > > ghostscript. > > I do not find it important what Ubuntu has or has not done. So you > "shall" not mention that - but you "may" as you please :-)
Pardon my vocabulary then; I ain't native english writer. That written, given the state of most of the printing stack in Ubuntu and the person maintaining most of these packages there (Till, openprinting's main upstream), I do find that what Ubuntu has done is important. This doesn't mean that we can't keep a critical eye upon their changes, but the fact that a change is already implemented and tested by them is still a valuable information IMHO. Cheers, OdyX -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
