Your message dated Fri, 28 Oct 2005 06:32:28 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#328203: fixed in statdataml 1.0.9-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Sep 2005 05:22:49 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 13 22:22:49 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp2.stanford.edu [171.67.16.125] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1EFPjN-0005UJ-00; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 22:22:49 -0700
Received: from windlord.stanford.edu (windlord.Stanford.EDU [171.64.19.147])
        by smtp2.Stanford.EDU (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j8E5MlMp030930
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 22:22:48 -0700
Received: by windlord.stanford.edu (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id 03378E7955; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 22:22:47 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: octave-statdataml: rebuild required for hdf5 transition
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 22:22:46 -0700
X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
        X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: octave-statdataml
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Justification: Policy 2.2.1

The current octave-statdataml package depends on hdf5 1.6.2, which has
been replaced by hdf5 1.6.4.  This package needs to be rebuilt to pick
up the new libraries so that hdf5 can migrate into testing.  No source
changes should be required, only a new upload to force a rebuild.

Please try to get to this soon, as the hdf5 (and lam and mpich)
transition has gotten rather complex.  Thank you!

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.4.30
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) (ignored: LC_ALL set to C)

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 328203-close) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Oct 2005 13:43:59 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 28 06:43:59 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1EVULM-0000rI-00; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 06:32:28 -0700
From: Andrew Pollock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#328203: fixed in statdataml 1.0.9-2
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 06:32:28 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: statdataml
Source-Version: 1.0.9-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
statdataml, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

octave-statdataml_1.0.9-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/s/statdataml/octave-statdataml_1.0.9-2_i386.deb
r-cran-statdataml_1.0.9-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/s/statdataml/r-cran-statdataml_1.0.9-2_i386.deb
statdataml_1.0.9-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/s/statdataml/statdataml_1.0.9-2.diff.gz
statdataml_1.0.9-2.dsc
  to pool/main/s/statdataml/statdataml_1.0.9-2.dsc



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Andrew Pollock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated statdataml package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 23:05:05 +1000
Source: statdataml
Binary: octave-statdataml r-cran-statdataml
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.0.9-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Andrew Pollock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 octave-statdataml - GNU Octave package for XML-based data exchange
 r-cran-statdataml - GNU R package for XML-based data exchange
Closes: 328203
Changes: 
 statdataml (1.0.9-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * QA Group upload orphaning this package
   * Package rebuild to pick up new libraries (closes: #328203)
Files: 
 6609c65b89b469f3cd1cc2a6a6ddec7b 726 math optional statdataml_1.0.9-2.dsc
 9b99d642f0bd8bdaddb1095db0f9bab9 5187 math optional statdataml_1.0.9-2.diff.gz
 7f79e54db6e665ec9987f4a5b5555c0f 150242 math optional 
r-cran-statdataml_1.0.9-2_i386.deb
 66f32ae948cd803f48034d14feed9e40 27688 math optional 
octave-statdataml_1.0.9-2_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDYiTaIblXXKfZFgIRAoaDAKC73N8flgpXWjdS81rCqcAQHeVZ+QCfY65q
jAgGS1DXUrlgVKg7PkKFgLI=
=/vw6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to