On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 10:55:49 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Le lundi 23 juillet 2012 à 10:46 +0200, Julien Cristau a écrit : > > Package: gnome-shell > > Version: 3.4.1-8 > > Severity: serious > > > > The default browser should be one that has at least vaguely credible > > security support, IMO. epiphany doesn't qualify, chromium or iceweasel > > probably would. > > As explained on IRC, they would if at the *very least* they supported > GTK3. > I don't think "doesn't support gtk3" can be more of a blocker than "has 0 security support". I agree it's not ideal, but it doesn't seem there's much of a choice.
Cheers, Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
