On 2012-07-16 15:50, The Wanderer wrote: > According to the ati.cchtml.com bug, this is actually a problem with > libpciaccess not handling 64-bit pointers correctly in some cases. The > patch
No. libpciaccess gets passed incorrect 64bit pointers. > available there is a patch for libpciaccess, described by its author as > an "ugly > hack" (on which I agree, as it seems to be hardware-specific to some > degree). The binary blobs are passing invalid pointers, the blobs can't be patched, only the receiving side can be patched to work around the invalid input data. > As such, shouldn't this bug be redirected to the libpciaccess0 package? No. Andreas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
