I'm aware of this problem. Not really sure that it should be considered grave but as we have a solution to it I do not really bother.
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 02:37:59AM +0200, Jérémy Bobbio wrote: > tags 328209 + patch > found 328209 0.30.208-3 > thanks > > Hi! > > The current way of detecting the syscall number is broken for any build > done without a patched kernel. This doesn't show up on i386 as the > configure script use it as by default. Known problem. > Attached is a patched which modifies the configure.ac (and required > files) by using the vserver.h found upstream [1]. The buildd should > then be able to detect the correct syscall number. Sounds really great, thanks! > For clarity, the patch only provides the needed changes to autotools > source files: "autoreconf" needs to be called to regenerated the > configure script and other files. Ok. I think this really should be applied upstream as well. Or even better applied upstream and then I will use the new tarball. :) > [1] http://vserver.13thfloor.at/Experimental/SYSCALL/vserver.h Ok. Lot of defines here. :) Regards, // Ola > Regards, > -- > Jérémy -- --------------------- Ola Lundqvist --------------------------- / [EMAIL PROTECTED] Annebergsslingan 37 \ | [EMAIL PROTECTED] 654 65 KARLSTAD | | +46 (0)54-10 14 30 +46 (0)70-332 1551 | | http://www.opal.dhs.org UIN/icq: 4912500 | \ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 / --------------------------------------------------------------- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
