forwarded 681066
http://lists.randombit.net/pipermail/botan-devel/2012-July/001624.html
thank you

Well, we talked about that with Jack Lloyd before 1.10 release, and the goal was
to keep ABI stable for whole 1.10 release, so this is certainly a bug.

Thanks for forwarding that directly to upstream.

O.

On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 1:32 PM, Markus Wanner <mar...@bluegap.ch> wrote:
> Package: libbotan-1.10-0
> Version: 1.10.2-1
> Severity: critical
>
> As Francis Russel pointed out on the Debian packaging mailing list for
> monotone, it looks like Botan 1.10.2 broke ABI compatibility compared to
> 1.10.1, see here:
> http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/monotone-debian/2012-07/msg00000.html
>
> I can confirm ABI compatibility between versions 1.10.1 and 1.10.2 of
> Botan is not given. I've identified the cause, successfully tried a
> work-around (patch attached) and contacted the upstream author(s), see
> here:
> http://lists.randombit.net/pipermail/botan-devel/2012-July/001624.html
>
> With this bug report I hope to stop 1.10.2 from propagating further and
> think upstream will soon release 1.10.3 (or take whatever other actions
> they think are appropriate).
>
> Regards
>
> Markus Wanner



-- 
Ondřej Surý <ond...@sury.org>



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to