forwarded 681066 http://lists.randombit.net/pipermail/botan-devel/2012-July/001624.html thank you
Well, we talked about that with Jack Lloyd before 1.10 release, and the goal was to keep ABI stable for whole 1.10 release, so this is certainly a bug. Thanks for forwarding that directly to upstream. O. On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 1:32 PM, Markus Wanner <mar...@bluegap.ch> wrote: > Package: libbotan-1.10-0 > Version: 1.10.2-1 > Severity: critical > > As Francis Russel pointed out on the Debian packaging mailing list for > monotone, it looks like Botan 1.10.2 broke ABI compatibility compared to > 1.10.1, see here: > http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/monotone-debian/2012-07/msg00000.html > > I can confirm ABI compatibility between versions 1.10.1 and 1.10.2 of > Botan is not given. I've identified the cause, successfully tried a > work-around (patch attached) and contacted the upstream author(s), see > here: > http://lists.randombit.net/pipermail/botan-devel/2012-July/001624.html > > With this bug report I hope to stop 1.10.2 from propagating further and > think upstream will soon release 1.10.3 (or take whatever other actions > they think are appropriate). > > Regards > > Markus Wanner -- Ondřej Surý <ond...@sury.org> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org