reassign 335564 fam 2.7.0-8
merge 327241 335564
thanks
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005, Ming Hua wrote:
> I don't mind having this bug (it can be merged with #323216), but it's
> definitely not grave. The real problem, as the discussion linked at the
> end of #323216 indicated, is that gedit trying to dlopen two modules
> (the libfile.so mentioned above, and scim's GTK IM module) links to
> different versions of libstdc++. And in despite of libstdc++ getting
> built with versioned symbol, this is still causing problems (some
> unversioned symbols get into the library anyway). There is a bug
> against gcc-4.0 for this, #328421.
>
> As eventually all packages should be built with GCC 4.0, rebuilding scim
> sure won't help. So do the gedit maintainers want this bug back? If
> not, I'll accept it, downgrade it to normal and merge with #323216.
The real bug is with fam, libfam0c102 is still installed on some
etch/sid systems, and shouldn't be. This is #327241 and I'm merging
the reports.
On my system for example:
dpkg -l libfam\*
un libfam0 <none> (no description available)
ii libfam0c102 2.7.0-7 client library to control the FAM daemon
No gnome-vfs2 rebuild should be necessary.
Cheers,
--
Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
