On Mon, 25 Jun 2012 10:36:50 +0200 Arne Wichmann wrote: > So, at least as far as I can see, there are a number of things to be done > in various time frames: > - Alert enough people to the problem (via debian-user, messages in the > packaging, other mailing lists and similar means)
I am not sure debian-user is the appropriate place for such a call for help... What do you mean by "messages in the packaging"? As far as other mailing lists are concerned, I tried to see if other debian-legal participants could join me in this persuasion effort, but I unfortunately received no reply: https://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2009/10/msg00000.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2010/02/msg00007.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2010/02/msg00023.html Maybe debian-science could be another appropriate mailing list, but I suspect that a good number of its participants are already aware of the issue, due to the various bug reports filed against packages maintained by the Debian Science team: #617613, #617931, and #618968 (that is to say, this one). > - Remove the package from debian if nothing happens. I am trying hard to avoid this, but I am failing to get help from other people... That's really frustrating! :-( -- http://www.inventati.org/frx/frx-gpg-key-transition-2010.txt New GnuPG key, see the transition document! ..................................................... Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
pgp5QyePWPgxr.pgp
Description: PGP signature
