On 22/06/12 13:28, intrig...@debian.org wrote:
> Package: vidalia
> Version: 0.2.19-1
> Severity: serious
>
> vidalia now Depends: apparmor, although the latter package is not
> needed for Vidalia to provide a significant amount of functionality.
> I believe this is a violation of the Debian Policy.
>
> In general, packages that ship an AppArmor profile Suggests: apparmor,
> which looks sane to me.
Hi intrigeri!

I would have totally agreed with you on this on any other situation,
provided that this issue[1] on dh-apparmor's postinst scripts handling
didn't existed.

Since this very very simple "typo" throws the Vidalia enduser a totally
harmless but error-message-at-the-end[2], I thought I was better to
avoid the user get confused about any possible issue on Vidalia, in
contrast to depending on an extra single package, of course, up to
dh-apparmor fixes this issue.



Cheers,


:d:


ref:
1. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=10;bug=678526
2. (Reading database ... 382389 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to replace vidalia 0.2.19-1 (using
.../vidalia_0.2.19-1_amd64.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement vidalia ...
Setting up vidalia (0.2.19-1) ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/vidalia.postinst: line 51: type: aa-status: not found

-- 
BOFH excuse #442:
Trojan horse ran out of hay


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to