Your message dated Thu, 20 Oct 2005 22:37:42 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bug report in error
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Oct 2005 23:24:46 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 20 16:24:46 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ms-smtp-02.nyroc.rr.com [24.24.2.56] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1ESjm9-0005ht-00; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 16:24:46 -0700
Received: from doctormoo (cpe-24-59-102-147.twcny.res.rr.com [24.59.102.147])
        by ms-smtp-02.nyroc.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id 
j9KNOhDK002898;
        Thu, 20 Oct 2005 19:24:43 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from neroden by doctormoo with local (Exim 4.54)
        id 1ESjm7-00079v-Ar; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 19:24:43 -0400
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: francine: Uninstallable in unstable: please build-depend on 
libslang1-dev or
 libslang2-dev
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 19:24:43 -0400
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: francine
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

Thanks to a slang transition, 'francine' is uninstallable in unstable
(and so will never be in another Debian release unless this is fixed).

Either it should be patched for slang2 (bug #315230), or if there's
a problem with that, it should Build-Depend on libslang1-dev.  slang1-dev
is gone.

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 334936-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Oct 2005 02:37:45 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 20 19:37:45 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ms-smtp-03.nyroc.rr.com [24.24.2.57] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1ESmmv-00023X-00; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 19:37:45 -0700
Received: from doctormoo (cpe-24-59-102-147.twcny.res.rr.com [24.59.102.147])
        by ms-smtp-03.nyroc.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id 
j9L2bg7Z003685
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 22:37:42 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from neroden by doctormoo with local (Exim 4.54)
        id 1ESmms-0000PJ-9R
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 22:37:42 -0400
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 22:37:42 -0400
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: bug report in error
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
From: Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
        version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

libslang1 is supposed to provide slang1, so this isn't really true.
The uninstallability was due to local trouble.
Closing.

-- 
Nathanael Nerode  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

[Insert famous quote here]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to