On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 16:36 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > On 2005-10-19 15:49:07 +0200, Frank Küster wrote: > > No, it isn't, since 334613 is against 3.0-9, and has only been > > introduced by this upload. I don't know what is happening with 2.0.2, > > and honestly I won't try to find out, since this version is no longer > > available in sid. If you like, you can report a separate bug against > > the testing version, but I won't put time into it. > > If the unstable packages are going to be fixed before 2.0.2, then > this is fine.
Sorry, but I am not sure what you are trying to tell here. Since 3.0 is in unstable, we can't easily provide a fixed 2.0.2 package for testing, even if we had the manpower to do so. We can only try to offer workarounds. In your case, I think it would be best to uninstall jadetex and texinfo. After that, update to teTeX 3.0 from unstable, which works fine if jadetex is not present. After that, reinstall jadetex and texinfo. HTH. cheerio ralf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
